Peter Roskam Votes to Continue War, Torture

On Wednesday, November 14, Peter Roskam voted to continue the war in Iraq and refused to outlaw torture and inhumane treatment of prisoners in the conduct of that war, continuing to demonstrate his unfailing support for the policies of the Bush administration.
Roskam voted “no” on H.R. 4156: Orderly and Responsible Iraq Redeployment Appropriations Act, 2008. The bill, if enacted would:
- Express the opinion of the Congress that U.S. military personnel, should be commended for their work in Iraq and Afghanistan, that the war in Iraq should be brought to a rapid conclusion and our troops brought home as quickly as possible, and that funds allocated under this bill should be used, not to prolong the war, but rather to end it. (These are non-binding provisions).
- Prohibit allocated funds from being used in violation of the United Nations conventions regarding torture
- Prohibit the president from deploying a military unit to Iraq that he has not certified as “fully mission capable”
- Prohibit allocated funds from being used to establish permanent bases in Iraq or from being used to exercise control over Iraqi oil
- Require the administration to report to Congress on it’s plans for attaining regional stability in the Middle East and on measure of progress in Iraq
- Provide funding for the troops
The bill passed in the House and was referred to the Senate.
On Saturday, in his weekly radio address, President Bush berated the Congress for not supporting the troops and, paradoxically, threatened to veto the spending bill that he was demanding they pass. Why? Because, he says, Congress is telling his generals what to do.
But aside from expressing the sense of the Congress regarding an end to the war, the bill only demands 4 things:
- Don’t torture
- Don’t steal Iraqi oil
- Don’t set up permanent military bases in Iraq
- Keep the Congress informed as to how things are going
So what does Peter Roskam’s and George Bush’s refusal to support this bill to fund the troops?
- They want to be able to continue to practice torture and other inhumane treatment
- They want to control Iraqi oil reserves
- They want to occupy Iraq permanently
- And they believe that they should be able to do whatever they want without any accountability to the American public, and, in Peter’s case, to the voters in his district
3 comments
It’s astonishing that America sponsors torture — especially after the horrors World War II and recent wars in Africa. We’ve become a monster, thanks to Roskam. He is a lackey of the Bush warmongers and has to go.
Larry Bodine
Democratic Committeeman
Precinct 45
the torture in iraq is inhumane those who support it should be given the same piece of cake and the deepest dungeon of Hell SHOULD BE RESERVED 4 THEM.
fuck america man………..bitch for george w bush
Leave a Comment