Veterans

Earlier today, Republican Congressman Peter Roskam voted to cut Medicare payments to physicians, putting at risk access to care and choice of physician for the nations senior citizens, for disabled persons served by Medicare, and for families of U.S. military personnel receiving care through TRICARE, the health care program serving active duty service members, National Guard and Reserve members, retirees, and their families and survivors. It was just Peter Roskam’s way of saying thank you to the nation’s elders and soldiers for their hard work and sacrifices for their country, and thank you to the nation’s physicians as well for their efforts on behalf of their patients.

The vote was on H.R.3961 – Medicare Physician Payment Reform Act of 2009. Congressional action was required on this bill to prevent physicians caring for seniors and military families from receiving a 21% pay cut in 2010. Such a drastic cut in physician reimbursement would force many physicians caring for seniors and for military families to stop accepting such patients or dratically cut back on the number of physicians. This would result in many patients losing access to their physician of choice and perhaps losing access to care altogether. Roskam himself described the access problem in a letter attacking similar impending cuts back in 2008:

“Despite the rising costs of living, Congress is unwisely poised to cut Medicare payments for physicians, severely limiting access to medical care for an ever growing senior population,” said Roskam. “If such cuts are enacted, Illinois will lose $510 million for the care of elderly and disabled patients over the next year, and $10 billion over eight years. It is my sincere hope the bipartisan support from many of my fellow colleagues will help restore this funding, insuring that Medicare patients can find physicians in their community with the financial ability to treat them.”

Medicare seniors look to their doctor as the key professional in charge of their care. Every aspect of our health care system from hospitals to rural health clinics relies upon the skills and services of physicians. A stable payment structure for physician services is critical. The impending cuts will only destabilize the Medicare program and jeopardize all patients’ access to care if not addressed in a thoughtful manner. It is critical that we work together in a bipartisan fashion to enact legislation early in this year to stop the Medicare cuts.

So  Roskam’s support of pay cuts to doctors this time around is based in his obstructive partisanship rather than good policy and he is willing to let everyone suffer for it.  DuPage County Seniors, families of servicemen, and physicians should take note of this vote and remember it next fall.

Fortunately, Peter Roskam did not get his way. H.R. 3961 passed by a vote of 243-183. Only a single Republican voted for the bill: Rep. Michael Burgess of Texas. We see once again that all the Republican protestations about supporting the troops are really just so much hot air.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement on the passage of H.R. 3961:

“Strengthening Medicare for generations to come is essential to our efforts to reforming health care for all Americans. This legislation will permanently improve the way Medicare pays physicians and in doing so, guarantee that America’s seniors will continue to have access to excellent care through Medicare.

“This legislation is a top priority for seniors and was endorsed by the AARP and the American Medical Association because it protects seniors’ access to their doctor, promotes primary care, and offers incentives for doctors to provide patients with higher quality and more efficient care. Today’s vote by the House keeps our promise to strengthen Medicare, never weaken it.

“As this legislation heads to the Senate, the statutory ‘pay as you go’ budget bill will be added to ensure that we put our nation back on a path of fiscal responsibility and begin to bring down the deep deficits that face our nation.”

I thought Henry Hyde and Peter Roskam had licked those problems years ago by pretending they don’t exist.

But here I read that Ben Lowe, our new Democratic Candidate for the House of Representatives in the 6th District went to a forum on “Homelessness in DuPage County” yesterday at the Wheaton Public Library and Ben reports that poverty and homelessness are still with us after all:

According to DuPage County Continuum, there are approximately 41,000 residents who are living below the poverty level and a solid quarter of these are children. A One Night survey conducted on January 22 2009 found 659 homeless people in the county that night (which, thanks to the increased efforts of groups like the ones above, is actually down from 766 in 2007!). Even so, in a district with as many financial resources as ours, this is 659 too many people without a roof over their heads.

And of course the poverty statistic understates the problem because the Federal poverty level is set so low: for a family of 4, $22,050. Can you imagine the difficulty of trying to feed clothe, and house a family of 4 here in DuPage County on just $22,050.

So, Ben, I’m wondering whether you happened to run into Peter Roskam at the meeting. You would have recognized him: an angry man with a receding hairline carrying handcuffs and a large stack of paper. I feel certain he must have been there -in his hometown,  with a problem this serious affecting his district. But then the Bears were playing…

I have to say, I think I’m developing a serious crush on our new candidate. Not only has he acknowledged the existence of poverty and homelessness here in our district but he thinks that government (which really just us banding together to manage things that we can’t manage as individuals) might actually be able to contribute to a solution:

Based on further suggestions from our panelists, here is what I agree the government can do to help more, especially during these tough economic times:

  • We must make Housing Choice Vouchers more accessible and dramatically reduce the waiting list (the wait can be up to 5 years for those that qualify)
  • We need to reform Medicaid We must invest in more affordable housing
  • We need to offer programs that help retrofit and upgrade old low-income housing units so that they save energy (and thus money) and make for healthier homes
  • For our veterans: we have great camps training civilians to be soldiers; we need to invest just as seriously into programs that help transition soldiers back into civilians.

I am anxious to hear Representative Roskam’s plan but I have a sneaking suspicion it will involve a repeal of the estate tax.

On Thursday, October 8th, Peter Roskam voted against passage of a $680 billion defense authorization bill that provides funding to our military for fiscal year 2010.  In doing so, Roskam voted against, among many other provisions:

  • A 3.4 percent pay raise for members of the armed services
  • A $6.7 billion allocation for mine-resistant armored vehicles (MRAPs) designed to protect soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • Procurement of body armor for those same soldiers
  • Aid for soldiers with catastrophic combat-related conditions to obtain personal care assistance during the period before retirement or disability becomes effective
  • A skill incentive bonus for members of the reserves
  • Bonuses for military linguists serving long-term in Afghanistan
  • Ensuring that servicemen on duty overseas have the opportunity to have their absentee votes counted
  • Funding research on tissue repair and transplantation for combat injuries

Why would Peter Roskam vote to defund the military? Because the bill also helps gay people.

Specifically, the bill extends the federal hate crimes legislation, passed in 1968 in the wake of the assasination of Rev. Martin Luther King, making violent crimes committed against people on the basis of sexual orientation federal offenses.

The legislation is important because it allows the federal government to intervene and prosecute such crimes in jurisdictions where local and state authorities prove unwilling to do so. While there is much work left to do, the bill is a big step toward ensuring that LBGT people are ensured equal status under the constitution and can enjoy the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence.

Roskam and other House Republicans voted against the bill because of opposition by Christian hate groups such as the Family Research Council that claim that their free speech rights will be violated by preventing them from demonizing gay people from pulpits lest one of their misguided followers commit a violent crime. The bill, however, contains no prohibitions on speech, though hopefully it will encourage more responsible speech on the part of some pastors. Their argument is a fallacy. Protection against crimes committed against persons on the basis of religion in the original 1968 legislation has in no way impaired the free speech rights of those who are critical of religion. But it has, appropriately, enabled federal involvement in investigation of crimes against Christians such as church burnings.

On May 21, 2009, just before the Memorial Day recess, Rep. Paul Broun of Georgia introduced H.R. 2586: To prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from authorizing honor guards to participate in funerals of veterans interred in national cemeteries unless the honor guards may offer veterans’ families the option of having the honor guard perform a 13-fold flag recitation, and for other purposes. Peter Roskam and 43 other members signed on as co-sponsors.

The bill is related to some controversy that has erupted surrounding the recitation that is sometimes made as the flag is being folded by voluntary Memorial Honor Details at the funerals of veterans being interred at National Cemeteries. The recitation consists of 13 points describing a symbolic meaning for each of the 13 folds, many of them religious in nature:

The first fold of our flag is a symbol of life.

The second fold is a symbol of our belief in the eternal life.

The third fold is made in honor and remembrance of the veteran departing our ranks, and who gave a portion of life for the defense of our country to attain peace throughout the world.

The fourth fold represents our weaker nature; for as American citizens trusting in God, it is to Him we turn in times of peace, as well as in times of war, for His divine guidance.

The fifth fold is a tribute to our country, for in the words of Stephen Decatur, “Our country, in dealing with other countries, may she always be right, but it is still our country, right or wrong.”

The sixth fold is for where our hearts lie. It is with our heart that we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

The seventh fold is a tribute to our Armed Forces, for it is through the Armed Forces that we protect our country and our flag against all enemies, whether they be found within or without the boundaries of our republic.

The eighth fold is a tribute to the one who entered into the valley of the shadow of death, that we might see the light of day, and to honor our mother, for whom it flies on Mother’s Day.

The ninth fold is a tribute to womanhood, for it has been through their faith, love, loyalty and devotion that the character of the men and women who have made this country great have been molded.

The tenth fold is a tribute to father, for he, too, has given his sons and daughters for the defense of our country since he or she was first born.

The eleventh fold, in the eyes of Hebrew citizens, represents the lower portion of the seal of King David and King Solomon and glorifies, in their eyes, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

The twelfth fold, in the eyes of a Christian citizen, represents an emblem of eternity and glorifies, in their eyes, God the Father, the Son and Holy Ghost.

When the flag is completely folded, the stars are uppermost, reminding us of our national motto, “In God We Trust.”

It is not clear to me after perusing the sources I found whether the National Cemetery Administration at some point in 2007 actually banned the recitation or merely clarified its policy. If a ban was indeed instituted, I would certainly regard that as inappropriate. While no longer a religious person myself, I would regard the denial of a Veteran’s family the comforts of their religion in a time of grief as cruel and as a violation of their constitutional rights.

But whatever happened, the current VA policy does not deny Veterans that right. A clarification of the policy issued in October 2007 states the following:

“Honoring the burial wishes of veterans is one of the highest commitments for the men and women of VA,” said William F. Tuerk, VA’s Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs. “A family may request the recitation of words to accompany the meaningful presentation of the American flag as we honor the dedication and sacrifice of their loved ones.”

Traditional gravesite military funeral honors include the silent folding and presentation of an American flag, a rifle salute, and the playing of “Taps.”

The clarification includes the following:

* Volunteer honor guards are authorized to read the so-called “13-fold” flag recitation or any comparable script;
* Survivors of the deceased need to provide material and request it be read by the volunteer honor guards; and
* Volunteer honor guards will accept requests for recitations that reflect any or no religious traditions, on an equal basis.

So what’s the problem? Why H.R. 2586?

The bill is an attempt by the “we are a Christian Nation” crowd to require that this religious ceremony be actively pushed to families without any sensitivity to their own religious beliefs, if any. It is another lame attempt at incremental establishment of religion. It is an affront to all those citizens who do not share their Christian faith and who are also entitled to freedom of religion (or freedom from religion) and have also labored and fought and died to protect our country.  The bill will likely go nowhere as most of these idiotic ideas do but it is still annoying.

H.R. 2586 is not our Congressman’s first venture in the area of religious establishment. You may remember Roskam’s involvement , during his first term, with the wacky 10 Commandments Commission.

Thanks to Kitty Kurth for this news:

Peter Roskam, who is diametrically opposed to almost everything that Barack Obama stands for and is a member of the McCain leadership team, has been trying to peel off Obama voters. But, Obama supports Jill Morgenthaler for Congress in Illinois 6th District.

“While we’re pleased that Barack Obama continues to attract support from across party lines because of his long record of working with Republicans and independents to bring change, he believes Congressman Roskam would continue President Bush’s failed policies and is supporting Jill Morgenthaler for Congress.”

Justin DeJong, Illinois Director of Communications for Obama for America

Jill Morgenthaler’s press release is here.

In a press release dated May 22nd, 6th District Congressional candidate Jill Morgenthaler takes her opponent, Peter Roskam, to task, for his consistent failure to support legislation that would benefit Illinois veterans, including his recent no vote on the GI Bill. The release states:

Sixth District Democratic Congressional Candidate Jill Morgenthaler blasted her opponent Peter Roskam for his votes against veterans in the days leading up to Memorial Day. “What does Peter Roskam have against U.S. troops and veterans? Roskam says he supports vets and then repeatedly votes against us. When Roskam ran for Congress he said he was for our troops, but he voted against appropriations for the new GI Bill and against the future of our troops and veterans.”

“Roskam needs to keep his promises to our soldiers. He voted with President George Bush and John McCain and voted against soldiers and veterans. Our troops deserve better treatment. They deserve the healthcare and education that they were promised when they signed up,” said Jill Morgenthaler.

Morgenthaler, a businesswoman and a Colonel who served in the United States Army for thirty years, supports the new GI Bill (Post 911 Veterans Educational Assistance Act) and advocates that Congress should keep its commitment to health care and education benefits for the soldiers who have served our country. “Roskam and his fellow Republicans say they support ours troops and then vote against them. We need well trained soldiers to protect our nation. If we send soldiers in to battle, we need to keep our bargains with them after the battle.”

Amen to that. Roskam has been steadfast in his support of allowing George Bush to continue to send our young men and women in to harms way in Iraq. It’s time he offered them something more than photo ops and flowery statements when they come home. Roskam’s only interest in vets appears to be in using them as props in his re-election campaign. Speaking of which, Roskam was here in Elmhurst over the weekend for the Memorial Day Parade. I did not attend, but I understand from someone who did that Roskam used the event, not as a commemoration of those who have served and died but as a campaign event, replete with a coterie of marchers with Roskam for Congress signs.

Page 1 of 212